A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Patient Care Teams and Customer Satisfaction: the Role of Team Cohesion. Journal, Bisnis Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Enterpreneurship Vol.6 Nomor 2 Oktober 2012 85 – 93 ISSN 2443 – 0633. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Komitmen, dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. R.Okky Satria, dan Husaeri Priatna, (2012). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Situasional Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja (Studi Kasus Pada Karyawan PT. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Situasional Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Pada Karyawan Divisi Tower & Aproach Terminal (TWRA & APP-TMA) AirNav Indonesia Kantor Cabang Aero Traffic Control Soekarno Hatta).
Hidayati, Siti, Utami, H.N, dan Prasetya A. Metode Penelitian Manajemen: Pedoman Penelitian untuk skripsi, Tesis dan Disertai Ilmu Manajemen. Organizatonal Behavior Foundations Realities and Challenges, Thompson South Western, United States of America. Mathis, Robert L dan John H Jackson, 2002. Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi, edisi 7 jilid 1. Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi : Pendayagunaan Sumber Daya Manusia, Terjemahan Agus Dharma, Erlangga, Jakarta. Blanchard, 1996, Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi: Pendayagunaan Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Keempat, Alih Bahasa: Agus Dharma, Jakarta, Erlangga Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi: Pendayaagunaan Sumber Daya Manusia, Penerjemah: Agus Dharma, Jakarta: Erlangga. Hersey, Paul dan Kenneth Blanchard, 1995. Manajemen Sumber Daya Edisi kesepuluh jilid I. Journal Psycologi Reports, Vol42,pp 311-316. Relationship Between Locus of Control, Perceived Group Cohesiveness, and Satisfaction With Cowokers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25-41. Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Sport: Relationships with Leadership, Team Cohesion, and Athlete Satisfaction. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues Vol. Cohesiveness within teamwork: the relationship to performance effectiveness – case study. Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical Guildelines. This means that increasing situational leadership and group cohesiveness have a significant impact on performance improvement while work motivation and job satisfaction are not significant and (3) Job satisfaction does not mediate the influence of situational leadership, work motivation and group cohesiveness on employee performance. This means that the better situational leadership, the higher the work motivation and group cohesiveness, the higher employee job satisfaction will be, (2) Situational leadership, group cohesiveness has a positive and significant effect on employee performance while the effect of work motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance is not significant. Based on the results of the study, several conclusions can be formulated as follows: (1) Situational leadership, work motivation and group cohesiveness have a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction.
The analytical tool used is the SEM with the AMOS program. The population in this study were all civil servants in the scope of Konawe District Office of education and culture with a total of 120 ASNs and all of them were used as respondents. This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of situational leadership style, work motivation, and cohesiveness on job satisfaction and employee performance. Situational Leadership, Work Motivation, Cohesiveness, Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance Suriyadi, Dedy Takdir Syaifuddin, Dasmin Sidu, Mursidin Effects Of Situational Leadership, Work Motivation And Cohesiveness On Work Satisfaction And Employment Performance (A Case Study In Education And Cultural Office In Konawe Regency)